In a letter dated 21 July 2026, Capitol Hill Solicitors responded to a complaint issued on Dakolo’s behalf, insisting that the singer failed to perform at an event governed by Artist Performance Agreements signed on 20 February and 4 March 2026.
They dismissed claims that the promoter fell short on sound, lighting or technical production, and stressed that all requirements were met. The firm referenced contractual clauses covering expenses such as flights, ground transport, visas and accommodation, stating that the promoter suffered financial losses and is seeking to recover £4,000.
The letter also criticised publications made by Dakolo’s camp, warning that their clients reserve the right to pursue recovery in Nigeria or the United Kingdom.
A second letter from the same firm demanded the removal of certain public statements made by Dakolo’s representatives. They urged an amicable resolution to avoid litigation and requested a formal response within seven days, while maintaining that all rights under the agreement and the law remain fully reserved.
This dispute has escalated beyond private negotiation and may soon enter a more confrontational phase.
What does it takes to do business with someone without issues?. Some people shaa like wahala and not trustworthy.
ReplyDeleteEven if everything written in the letter are correct, is that why your client had to blackmail him with his personal info he is supposedly privy to? Timmy, whatever the outcome of this issue, make sure you sue that guy, nonsense.
ReplyDeleteBv God's Favor
Fire burning down Europe and the man wants his money to buy air conditioner and water tank. This is not the year to play with ppl's money.
ReplyDelete