Justice Rakiya Haastrup, said that in determining the case, the court adopted the sole issue distilled by the defendant (WAEC), in its written address.
According to the judge, the issue was whether the claimant had sufficiently proven his case based on the state of pleadings before the court to be entitled to the reliefs he sought.
Haastrup held that the evidence before the court tendered by the defendant, proved that the terms and conditions of employment of the claimant as contained in his offer of employment regulated his employment.
From pulse
Since 1995,but they cant tackle all this people squandering naija's money
ReplyDeleteA crime of 24years ago is just getting judgement. Nigeria I hail thee ooh.
ReplyDeleteWhether you like it or not , you are a Nigerian and that can't be changed. As if Such doesn't happen in America too. Ode somebody
DeleteOde abi ode, where America is still digging up sins of 50yrs and over. The way we even rubbish this country is so annoying. I love my country and Nigeria will be great again.
DeleteWhat is the statue of limitations for such offenses in Nigeria?? They should just dismiss him let him be. If he was charged years ago, he would have completed his sentence ten times over.
ReplyDeleteThis is why some people do not believe in the Judicial system.
ReplyDelete24 years!!! 1,2,3... 24!!!!
Jesus Christ
ReplyDeleteIyán ogún ọdún.
ReplyDeleteYou dismiss a WAEC official for alledged examination malpractice of 24yrs ago. I use the term alledged because from the article, there was no proof stated. Talk about killing an ant with a sledgehammer.
ReplyDeleteYet, the Kano state governor who was caught on video collecting bride in dollars, nothing was done to him. Rather the contracts of the man who reported him were terminated and the Governor was even cleared to run for re-election!
I see we are really fighting corruption to a standstill...