Ms. Prest told the court that her marriage to the deceased Managing Director of First Foundation Medical Engineering Company was conducted in 1996 under Kalabari Native Law and Custom, with her full consent and the blessing of her family.
She gave her testimony during ongoing proceedings before Justice Oluwatoyin Odusanya, which concern the management of Dr. Ajayi’s estate.
The claimants in the suit –Mrs. Adenike Oluyemisi Ajayi and her children (Tomi Deru, Olumide Ajayi, Omolade Soetan, Mayowa Okeowo, and Bisola Ajayi)– with filed Suit No. ID/3364LM/21 against Helen Prest and her daughter, Tomisin Ajayi.
They are seeking declaratory reliefs regarding the estate and inheritance rights of
In response, the defendants –led by Helen Prest– argue that Mrs. Adenike Ajayi had been estranged from Dr. Ajayi for over 35 years before his death. They maintain that the deceased had undergone a traditional Kalabari marriage with Ms. Prest, which confers inheritance rights on her.
At the resumed hearing, Ms. Prest, led in evidence by her counsel, Abiodun Owonikoko, SAN, tendered several documents, including a letter dated March 14, 1996, written by the late Dr. Ajayi to her mother, expressing his intention to marry her.
Earlier in her testimony, the witness informed the court that she is a published author of several educational books and has practised law for many years.
She also presented a series of photographs, including images of her mother, Mrs. Ella Prest, with Dr. Ajayi and their daughter, Tomisin Ajayi. Additional photos submitted included those of the family celebrating Mother’s Day, and another with Dr. Ajayi, Senator Olorunnimbe Mamora, and Ms. Prest.
Other exhibits included publications in Ovation Magazine and ThisDay Style from her 50th birthday celebration, featuring her with Dr. Ajayi and other dignitaries.
She also submitted a Punch Newspaper interview in which Dr. Ajayi publicly referred to her as his wife.
Furthermore, Ms. Prest tendered correspondence with the daughter of the first claimant, Mrs. Adenike Ajayi, in which she was addressed as “Mama” and thanked for her role during her wedding.
She also submitted a petition addressed to the Attorney-General of Lagos State, alleging the sale of a 21-hectare parcel of land located in the Chevron area of Lekki, Lagos, by the first claimant.
Another document presented was a letter to the Ministry of Interior requesting authentication of a Marriage Certificate dated July 6, 1974, purportedly presented by Mrs. Adenike Ajayi.
She testified the ministry replied it could not authenticate the certificate unless the original document was produced.
Ms. Prest also tendered the medical death certificate of Dr. Ajayi, issued by St. Nicholas Hospital.
Justice Odusanya admitted all the tendered documents into evidence and adjourned the case to November 3, 2025, for cross-examination by the claimants’ counsel, Mr. Kunle Adegoke, SAN.
In their statement of claim, the claimants asserted that Mrs. Adenike Oluyemisi Ajayi is the only surviving spouse of Dr. Tosin Ajayi, who died on April 26, 2020.
They are seeking a declaration that she is entitled to the personal chattels and one-third of the deceased’s estate.
They also seek a declaration that Ms. Prest, the first defendant, is not entitled to any share of Dr. Ajayi’s estate or personal belongings.
However, in their statement of defence, the defendants argue that the first claimant was merely an estranged spouse, as she and Dr. Ajayi had been separated for approximately 35 years before his death.
They stated that the deceased lived alone for 10 years before meeting the first defendant.
According to the defendants, after a period of courtship, Dr. Ajayi expressed his desire to marry Ms. Prest and travelled to Port Harcourt to meet her mother.
Upon acceptance of his proposal, he fulfilled all customary marriage rites in accordance with Kalabari tradition, as Ms. Prest is of Kalabari descent.
The defendants also claim that no Yoruba traditional marriage rites were ever performed between the deceased and the first claimant.
Under Kalabari custom, they contend, a wife is entitled to inherit her husband’s estate if he predeceases her, which, they argued, applies to the union between Dr. Ajayi and Ms. Prest.
It would be recalled that Mrs. Adenike Ajayi while being cross-examined by Owonikoko, SAN, in the ongoing suit last year told the Court that she never challenged or queried her husband, over his affair with Ms. Prest during his lifetime.
Asked if she sought legal advice challenging the relationship from her daughter and in-laws who were lawyers, she said as an honourable woman, she saw many of them around her husband but ignored as she was not ready to fight anyone.
When told that the late Dr. Ajayi had been living with Ms. Prest since 1997 till his death in 2020, and had openly recognised her as his wife, both at home and abroad, the witness said, “My husband had many of them as his side-chicks.”
From Kemolovehaven
So this case is still on?
ReplyDeleteAs in🤦♀️🤦♀️
DeleteMadam Ajayi senior, this particular side-chick is here to stay and inherit all she can lay her hands on.
ReplyDeleteSorry ma, manage whatever they give you.
That is what you get when you marry a community deek.
Omo, the mamma already zeroed her mind when he was alive, she didn't care about the side chiks. She con see say this one don turn Ette on top properties, she con drag am to court
Delete"My husband had many of them as his side-chicks'. Damn!
ReplyDeleteYou saw that too.
DeleteThese rich men's wives are trying o.
Wahala deh o
ReplyDeleteThis her saga never end
Hmmmm na wa oooo. Both of them are entitled to thé man's weaith. There's enough to go round..
ReplyDeleteHelen should stop posing as his wife, doing traditional wedding with your mom & 2 of her friends in her Port Harcourt parlor is not marriage.
ReplyDeleteWhat applies in kalabari tradition do not apply in Yoruba land.
Late Dr was living with her, he still had other side chicks. They were all side chicks.
Helen thought her own kayan mata was greatest,sorry it doesn't work in traditional rules.
Helen should just accept her fate and move on. She was a strange woman, and she will forever be one, no matter how she wants to paint it.
DeleteIt is so funny these strange women only have 1 or 2 children, mostly, but they will want to claim the whole property... Lobatan lol.... Helen lacked intelligence; she should have ensured her bag's safety from Dr. BFR prior to his passing. She should have ensured he bought her properties and chattels in her name rather than claiming the old properties that his first family has access to.
DeleteLate Dr loved his kids too much to buy properties in Helen's name and leave out those smart alecs. Charm no reach there.
DeleteLol
DeleteThe two wives are entitled to the estate of late Dr Ajayi. The 1st wife was enstranged from him for over 35yrs before his death and Helen lived with and took care of him for 25yrs before his demise. The 1st wife did not give him peace when alive and he sought it with another woman (Helen) and got it for 25yrs - that's not a joke. Even the Judge is an African and knows polygamy is allowed in our African culture and tradition. The whites who brought us christianity told us polygamy is sinful but homosexuality/LGBTQ is not sinful. However, there is no where in the Bible that condemns polygamy - only Bishops/clerics are forbidden from having more than one wife. Most of the people after God's heart were either polygamists or were never married - Abraham, David, Solomon, Apostle Paul, etc. So let's get it clear - the judge will give a judgement that will rationally and equitably distribute late Dr Ajayi's assets.
DeleteLol side chic after 25yrs Ogaju
ReplyDeleteMen will just die and leave different issues behind
ReplyDeleteI wonder!!! A man that new how he sprayed seeds everywhere could not do the basics of arranging his house before death called, even with his level of exposure, what a shame.
DeleteMy dear, that is polygamy for you. I realised that polygamy and baby mama stories only cause problems for the sitting wife and children, not for the person who brought it into the family. It is such a selfish act that needs to be banished in the world.
DeleteDainty T and Anon 16.00, make una dey play. Even Wills admitted to probate are even contested forever e.g. Okotie-Eboh's Estate (since 1966 o)! So whether a wealthy man put's his house in order or not, assets sharing must be contested. Polygamy is not new and even in the Bible. It is also part of African culture and tradition, even the whites have joined us (the Mormons of Utah). It is the prerogative of any man to indulge in it and for any wife to accept or not. It is not SINFUL.
DeleteGet your facts right. The Mormons do not accept polygamy.
DeleteInheritance saga 🙄🙄🙄
ReplyDeleteThey should just come to an amicable agreement. Atleast recognise her and her daughter. All these materials being fought for are vanities, you die and leave all behind.
ReplyDeleteHelen wasn't smart enough and to even think she's a lawyer.
ReplyDeleteAll these years you were living with him and you didn't legalized your union or even make sure you he bought properties in your name.
Just take your L and move on. In your next world if you see a married man you pick up your slippers and run 4/40.
Infact ehn...she should have at least got some properties in her name.
DeleteI wonder
DeleteWhat makes you think she didn’t try and the man just did not accept? What if the man only recognized her as a side chick? The man sef was not stupid. He knew exactly what he was doing. He was probably settling her with good money when he was alive.
DeleteLet the legal family drag her as long as they could. In fact let them drag her for the whole 35yrs the first couple were estranged. How can you call yourself a lawyer and didn’t ensure the man you were shackled up with is legally divorced ? Even ignorance is not an excuse cos a legal marriage cannot exist on top of another. And as a dude chic, anything that don’t have your name on it is not yours. It belongs to the man and you are not entitled to inheritance.
ReplyDeleteIt baffles me seriously, how she can fall flat like this and still fighting she thinks her connections will help her, Lori iro
DeleteIt’s not a matter of ignorance. She probably tried and tried but the man no gree. You people must think that it is easy to convince a man to transfer his assets to a side chick. Please that’s exactly what she was. A side chick that was living with the man. Men are really not that foolish.
DeleteCustomary marriage: Father/family rep of a woman hands her over to a man as the man's wife, collects the bride price from the husband/family or hands over the dowry to the husband/family, and "leads" or directs the "leading" (accompany) the daughter to her husband/family home. All other celebrations are extra. Palour traditional marriage is accepted.
ReplyDeleteThe real issue is can a man married under the Marriage Act be married again without first divorcing the first wife? She has already contended there was no first marriage. Let the Court decide.
Inheritance claims go beyond the money and properties. This type also deals with a quest of validation of the marriage.
Why did she not move for her own bag? Can a woman be satisfied. If possible, won't she want the first woman and her children to stay empty handed or to have been disinherited by Will. And how do we know without any doubt that she has not secured her bags.
One or two children? How many children wives now want to have? If a woman wants none, you guys say she is entitled. Why any complain over one.
Even if he had made a Will, the greedy among them would still fight. Inheritance fight is spawned mainly by greed and the desire to revenge. Where both are absent, there is usually no fight whether in monogamy or polygamy.
She who took care of the man for so long and in his last days when all women accept man care is not easy should benefit. Her daughter's own case is clearer and constitutional. She cannot be cut off from sharing in the remaining 70% the first woman does not claim as hers. All children no matter the circumstances of their conception and birth are entitled to benefit from their father's estate unless he said no by Will. That is what the Nigeria Constitution says.
All said let the court decide. Let the law develop. Let men and women have opportunity to learn and conduct their affairs in accordance with the expounded law.
I doubt if she secured her stay in the marriage if not she will not be fighting so hard for ppty including her ward. It is well Amen. Talk less of monitoring sale of land somewhere, lol she will monitor tire. She was not just recognised properly. He should have introduced her as the second wife that's the way polygamy is done iyawo ile knows iyawo Titun by introduced and acceptance
DeleteThere’s no evidence of the so called parlor marriage. Even picsure dem no snap
DeleteMessy Messy Messy. The daughter can get something but in all if she was not introduced to the legal family na illegitimate be that o n they can only prove she is his child via DNA. That's why the other day the late former governor's daughter wants DNA conducted on all the claimed children so that they know how to divide property may be that is what it will come to here for the child.
ReplyDeleteThis f00l1sh man that personified n1gga failure is still putting the legal wife and her children through torture through his "companion".
ReplyDeleteI wish the woman had the courage and self respect to adjust to the single life and raise her children in dignity. As a proper Lagosian from a family of repute, she had the chance to have a life instead of wasting it on a f00l that wasn't worth it.
The agbaya could "marry" one of his side pieces in a living room but failed to attend the proper weddings of two of his children he abandoned to chase skirt.
The kids were supposed to pee in his grave, fill it with dump junk and walk away to make their own names.
The only reason to be fighting this woman who left when the man's organs started protesting for justice is to salvage the next generation from his curse by donating it to different charities.
Eweleke
Delete25 years is not beans. If the first wife loved him so, she should have packed in to take care of him when he was ill and weak. But she sat there waiting for him to die, in the hands of a side chic? Then coming now to contest what? Abeg! Give Helen something for her stress and do DNA for her child. Case closed.
ReplyDeleteEven the children are shameless for joining their mother in this pointless fight. They should have talked her out of it and settled out of court. Let the man's legacy (or whatever is left of it) remain intact.
Na Okoya own we dey wait for. Drama ti poju! I wonder who would inheritance ghost town estate? Hahahah
Trust me it is the first wives children spear heading the fight. They are grown and well to do and what other ways to treat your fathers fuck up than to drag his sodechic after death...lol court o..mud ooo..all is fair
DeleteThe first wife and her kids are greedy... Like, what the hell? Their mother has been estranged from their family for a long time. The wealth is enough to share for both sides to inherit... Didn't one of the first wife's children also marry a man who had been in a long-term relationship with another woman? That man ended things suddenly and married her... Abeg, they should go and sit down. Helen's mistake was not marrying in the court... Grown-up children acting this greedy... Share both ways and let everyone go and care for their own.
ReplyDelete