Stella Dimoko Korkus.com: Nigerian Lawyers Protest Against The Rigorous Processes,Oppressive IT Consent And Dispatch Fees Of CAC

Advertisement

Advertisement - Mobile In-Article

Wednesday, July 29, 2020

Nigerian Lawyers Protest Against The Rigorous Processes,Oppressive IT Consent And Dispatch Fees Of CAC

Nigerian Lawyers are Calling for the Review of Recent Policies of the Corporate Affairs Commission ......






A Call for the Review of Recent Policies of the Corporate Affairs Commission made by NBA Abuja, Unity Bar, this day 27th July, 2020.

The above subject matter refers:
Sequel to the meeting had with your SA, Mr. Terver Ayua-Jor, who represented you, with regards to certain recent policies put into effect by the Corporate Affairs Commission, we hereby re-articulate our position as follows:



1. Embargo on Company Searches by Customers: 

This has greatly complicated the due diligence process and has led to unforeseen consequences of long delays (up to 3 months) and grievous mistakes in the search reports conducted by the Staff of the Commission. With thousands of applications yet to be made due to the delay in the process, this policy has stalled lots of commercial transactions like account openings and loans processing which are dependent on due diligence and company searches. More importantly, the embargo runs counter to Section 580 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act which creates an actionable right of access to books, register or file of registered documents for purposes of conducting Due Diligence Searches.



2. Commission’s Consent to Reserve Names Under Part “C” of CAMA: 


The requirement for Consent as contemplated by the Company and Allied Matters Act is reserved for restricted words or names and cannot be construed to apply to an entire class of Corporate Entities such as Incorporated Trustees. This is essentially an encroachment on the Right to Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Association.



3. Dispatch of Documents to Customers by Courier: 


While appreciating the need for a reorganized dispatch process, the policy of dispatch by courier is tantamount to outsourcing a primary statutory function of the Commission to a 3rd Party. After the first day of operations, we have received complains of the courier companies either charging outrageous amounts or putting calls across to the directors of the companies, an act which embarrasses the Commission, our members and their clients.
In the light of the above, we hereby recommend that:


1. Consent: This requirement be reversed, given that it does not have any statutory basis. Security agencies which have concerns with the names of entities to be registered under Part “C” can make recourse to advertorials made on national dailies for the purpose of raising specific objections as provided by law.

2. Search/Due Diligence: The same protocol which applies to the staff of the Commission should be applied to a restricted number of customers daily to enable them conduct searches within a specific period under strict surveillance pending when registration is made available to the public online.

3. Dispatch: Customers should be allowed to dispatch documents the manner the Commission instituted immediately after resumption from the lockdown. They should have dispatch by courier or return mail as option and should also be able to batch multiple certificates in a single delivery. This batching can be done through an interface on the Customer Registration Portal (CRP) without the need for extensive physical sorting.

a. The process of selecting the courier companies should be in line with the Public Procurement Act.

b. The names of all corporate entities registered from the date of resumption from the lockdown and whose certificates are domiciled at the Customer Service Unit should be saved in a PDF format from the system and made public to enable customers easily identify and dispatch their certificates.

4. Engaging Stakeholders: Despite the restrictions on physical meetings brought about by Covid-19, the Commission can still engage with stakeholders in the administration of CAMA through virtual meeting platforms like Zoom.

It is our earnest expectation that the Commission shall consider the above dispassionately and act accordingly in the best interest of the general public, the Commission and our members.


BULUS Y. ATSEN
CHAIRMAN
Nigerian Bar Association, Abuja Branch (Unity Bar).


ERIC IBE SECRETARY
Nigerian Bar Association, Abuja Branch (





8 comments:

  1. I'm so happy lawyers are speaking up.
    This is just the beginning.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you Stella...God bless you πŸ™

    ReplyDelete
  3. hmmmm this country...everyday one story or the other. when will they get things right biko nu

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @beebumble... Answer: When dinosaursπŸ¦• leave your country's government and public service for visionary, youthful, tech-savvy leaders. πŸ‘¨‍πŸŽ“πŸ‘¨‍πŸ«πŸ•΅️‍♀️πŸ§πŸš€⚡πŸŒπŸŒŽπŸ•›⏱️

      Delete
  4. If only they will hear and make things easier.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Registrar General ha options to explore to move the commission forward but they choose not to.

    Certificates can be printed online, the former RG started this but she was removed untimely,
    Even if courier companies must be used why not charge a fixed fee, these companies charge as much as 850 to pick up from their offices and more if they deliver to you, looking at the number of certificate that would be despatched the commission ought to look at an alternative price for same.

    For consent fee, for IT you pay for name reservation that is same as paying consent, so why the need for he extra 5k charge? These and lots more are the rules he has made and he has more to make that would negatively impact the customers to cac

    If this Man continues like this only time would tell, oshomole and Magu felt no one would do without them but look at them today and to think that he was groomed for that position,he just came into office before lockdown and all these negativity is around him,

    It would only take a while for him to step on higher toes and be shamed out of that position

    ReplyDelete
  6. Without consent of the parties CAC went ahead and assigned sensitive documents to 3rd parties, and when you get there you get charged N860. It is infuriating that people wake up one day and impose Bill's on you.

    ReplyDelete

Disclaimer: Comments And Opinions On Any Part Of This Website Are Opinions Of The Blog Commenters Or Anonymous Persons And They Do Not Represent The Opinion Of StellaDimokoKorkus.com

Pictures and culled stories posted on this site are given credit and if a story is yours but credited to the wrong source,Please contact Stelladimokokorkus.com and corrections will be made..

If you have a complaint or a story,Please Contact StellaDimokoKorkus.com Via

Sdimokokorkus@gmail.com
Mobile Phone +4915210724141