On Monday was International women's day and Benedicta, baby mama to OAP Freeze says living in Nigeria gives women no right...she lives in a Country (Nigeria) where the fundamental rights of a woman is non existent.
Benedicta is reacting to claims that her former Marriage ended as a result of Adultery with OAP Freeze with whom she has a son.
Her Ex took her and lover freeze to court for Adultery and won and they are both are contesting the win...
They should go to appeal court...Nigeria is really a country of anywhere-anything-goes..This woman filed for divorce as far back as 2012..The courts did nothing but they waited till when her ex- husband filed a case in 2021, quick quick the judgement is that they should pay for committing adultery..So Justice can be bought by the highest bidder right..Nigeria has a long way to go...
ReplyDeleteIf you are Nigerian , it’s a pity because you lack COMMON sense . Ignorance of the law is no excuse !
DeleteOn what grounds was she seeking divorce in 2012 ? Her husband has every right to end his contract with a filthy strumpet who not only commit adulterous sacrilege but also have a bastard product to show for her shameless entanglement. #spit
Husband welcome. E pain you gaaaan. But if you are gay why not set her free?
DeleteAs for that hospital, they can't lie. The courts delayed her divorce sha. But then she was instrumental to freeze broken marriage.
ReplyDeletePeople shld free the lady. Isnt the Ex a known gay man?
DeleteSo people expect her to stay put in a sham and unhappy marriage.
Let them pay d 5m if dat is what he wants.
What role do 'umunna'people play in a marriage again.
ReplyDeleteIs it only to be collecting long listed items, drinking ,eating,and waiting for the next?
Just asking
Alagbere trying to defend her actions. Mtcheeeww
ReplyDeleteBenedicta you did not do this well. you left things too late and allowed paul to be forming what I dont know. we know he took you to court to spite you cos he is gay as day. I pray you win your appeal because bad belle against this your freezy sef na another matter. lol....all the best
ReplyDeleteWhy cant they bring up this gay issue in court sef, atleast it will help their case.
DeleteExcept if they were advised not too bcos of lack of evidence to prove he swings both ways.
Hmmmmmmmm
ReplyDeleteI'm on freeze side but this babe would mess this shii up with this nonsense women victim card she's playing. Na only for social media you fit win with this method cos other women would join to shout and make noise together. That's not how it's done on court.
ReplyDeleteWe all face injustice in this country, expecially the poor, she should shut it with the whole women victim shii..
It would be hard for her to win this case, legally she's wrong but morally she might not be, if it's true the guy is gay. But that would be hard to prove, I doubt she's got any evidence. That's why they want to go the domestic violence route..
Even freeze knows it's a tough one,he just doesn't want to pay the 5m without a fight.
Good luck
Does he have the N5m? He has to fight oo.
DeleteNa wa......o
ReplyDeleteApril 2014 Fuckery.
ReplyDeletePrime medical will have testify in court.
Wahala be like adultery wey Freezeš„“
ReplyDeleteHer ex husband is not on SM making noise like them, was she in her husband's house and still legally married when she got pregnant and had a baby with daddy freeze? If yes then...
ReplyDeleteThe woman is reported to have filed her case in 2012. The letter shown above is dated 17/4/2014. The letter also states "ex-husband". The domestic violence alleged and recorded by the letter writer is after the divorce proceedings is claimed to have started. So it does not support a case of marital violence or violence prior to the divorce case.
ReplyDeleteThe woman has not told the world what she based her divorce case on and the evidence presented in support of it. She lost her case. Her ex-husband won his counter-case. She or her consort ("Mr. Freeze") are free to appeal against the judgment to the Supreme Court. That is the way to go instead of casting speculative aspersions on persons and the court.
Was her ex-husband gay? Was that the basis she sued for divorce? Did she tell the court? Did she support her claim with credible evidence?
Without seeing the records of the court, any criticisms of the court's judgment is based on speculation. The delay in deciding a case may be the fault of the parties to a case, or the fault of their lawyers, or the fault of the court, or the fault of all three. Only the court's record can really show who truly delayed the case or who is more guilty of the delay in a case.
"Mr. Freeze" has said he would appeal because he was not served with the court's notice of suit not because he did not sleep with or impregnate the woman while she was still legally married to her husband. Please note this fine distinction - "Mr. Freeze" proposed appeal is based on law (a legal point) not on facts of liability.
It would be good for the woman to appeal on facts - that she did not sleep with "Mr. Freeze" while married or that she was beaten out of the marriage by her ex-husband and was pushed out of the marriage because her ex-husband is gay.
Until then the judgment stands and ...
When has adultery become a crime, only in Nigeria
ReplyDeleteAnd you say you read and you have Sense? May wisdom locate you.
Delete